Burnout, resilience and work engagement among Dutch intensivists in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis: A nationwide survey

This article by Meynaar and others was first published in Journal of Critical Care during November 2020.
Purpose:  The COVID-19 crisis put a strain on intensive care resources everywhere in the world increasing the risk of burnout. Previously, the prevalence of burnout among Dutch intensivists was found to be low. Engagement and resilience among intensivists have not previously been studied quantitatively, however, both are related to burnout and provide a possible way to mitigate burnout. Our objective was to study burnout and its association with work engagement and resilience among Dutch intensivists in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis.
Methods:  An online questionnaire was sent to all Dutch intensivists. The questionnaire consisted of questions on personal and work-related characteristics and validated questionnaires: the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, and the Resilience Evaluation Scale.
Results:  The response rate was 27.2% with 162 evaluable responses. Thirteen respondents (8.0%) were classified as having burnout, 63 (38.9%) respondents were reporting high work engagement. Burnout was found to be negatively associated with both work engagement and resilience.
Conclusion:  In the aftermath of the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, we found a raised prevalence of burnout among intensivists, however this is still low in international comparisons. Intensivists with burnout scored low on resilience and low on work engagement.
The full text of this article is available to subscribers via this link to the journal’s homepage.  The full text of articles from issues older than sixty days is available via this link to an archive of issues of Journal of Critical Care.  A Rotherham NHS Athens password is required.  Eligible staff can register for an Athens password via this link.  Please speak to the library staff for more details.

A national survey of approaches to manage the ICU patient with opioid use disorder

This paper by Reicheld and colleagues was published online at the end of June 2019 in the Journal of Critical Care.
Purpose:  Opioid associated admissions to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are increasing, but how institutions manage the care of these patients is unknown. We studied the availability of protocols and guidelines in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) for the management of the critically ill patient with opioid use disorder.
Materials and methods:  A survey was sent to a random sampling of ICU clinicians at acute care hospitals in the United States.
Results:  Of the 300 hospitals contacted, 118 agreed to participate and 58 submitted surveys (49%, 58/118 response rate). While a majority of ICUs has a guideline to titrate sedative analgesics, only 7% reported a guideline that addresses the sedation needs of patients with opioid use disorder. Only one respondent identified a guideline for the continuation of medication-assisted treatment such as methadone. Most respondents did not have, or were unaware of, a guideline to manage opioid withdrawal or to prevent over-reversal with naloxone. Outpatient resources were offered to patients by 36% of institutions, while even fewer reported the use of a dedicated addiction care team.
Conclusions:  Few institutional guidelines exist to provide clinicians with the tools necessary to prevent harm and promote recovery for this growing and vulnerable ICU population.
The full text of this article is available to subscribers via this link to the journal’s homepage.  The full text of articles from issues older than sixty days is available via this link to an archive of issues of Journal of Critical Care.  A Rotherham NHS Athens password is required.  Eligible staff can register for an Athens password via this link.  Please speak to the library staff for more details.

Current practice and perceptions regarding pain, agitation and delirium management in patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

This article by Dzierba and colleagues was first published in the Journal of Critical Care during May 2019.
Purpose:  To characterize monitoring of pain, agitation, and delirium; investigate opioid and sedative choices; and describe prevention and treatment of delirium in adults receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) for respiratory failure.
Materials and methods:  International, cross-sectional survey distributed January 2018 to members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Results:  Respondents were predominately physicians (58%) from North America (89%). Fentanyl (77%) and hydromorphone (48%) were the most common intravenous opioids used to manage pain. A deep level of sedation was targeted in the first 24-h after initiation of vv-ECMO 64% of the time. When deep sedation was targeted, propofol (70%) and benzodiazepines (41%) were the most common sedatives. The most common sedatives for light sedation were dexmedetomidine (45%) and propofol (39%). Delirium prevention included avoidance of benzodiazepines (73%), whereas the most common treatment strategy was scheduled atypical antipsychotics (83%). Centers that extubated patients during vv-ECMO used dexmedetomidine as the second preferred sedative as compared to benzodiazepines at non-extubating centers (p = 0.04).
Conclusions:  Most respondents use validated scales and protocols to assess and manage pain, agitation/sedation, and delirium. The majority of respondents reported targeting a deep level of sedation with propofol being used for both deep and light levels of sedation.
The full text of this article is available to subscribers via this link to the journal’s homepage.  The full text of articles from issues older than sixty days is available via this link to an archive of issues of Journal of Critical Care.  A Rotherham NHS Athens password is required.  Eligible staff can register for an Athens password via this link.  Please speak to the library staff for more details.